ASO 9 min read

ASO fundamentals for install-driven companies

Every paid install passes through a store page. If that page converts at twenty percent instead of thirty, you are paying a fifty percent premium on every campaign you run — permanently, and invisibly.

ASO is a conversion problem before it is a keyword problem

Most ASO advice starts with keywords, which is the right advice for organic discovery and the wrong priority for a paid-heavy app. If the majority of your installs come from ads, the store page is a landing page, and its conversion rate is a direct multiplier on every campaign's cost per install. Improve it and every channel gets cheaper at once.

Start by separating the two jobs. Discovery ASO — title, subtitle, keyword field, category — determines who arrives organically. Conversion ASO — icon, first screenshots, video, ratings, first two lines of description — determines who installs once they arrive. Paid teams should fix the second first.

The elements that move conversion

  • Icon. The single most tested element, and the one with the largest effect on the browse surface. Simplicity beats detail at 60 pixels.
  • First two screenshots. Roughly the only ones most visitors see. They should state the value proposition in text, not showcase the interface.
  • Message match with the ad. If the ad promised a specific outcome, screenshot one must show that outcome. A generic listing behind a specific ad is where install rates go to die.
  • Ratings and recent review sentiment. Below roughly 4.2 stars, other optimisations get expensive. Fix the reason before the wording.
  • First 170 characters of description. The only part read before a tap on 'more'. Treat it as a headline, not a preamble.

A store page tested against ad angles, rather than in isolation, routinely outperforms a beautifully designed generic one.

Localisation is not translation

Localised listings outperform translated ones consistently, and for unglamorous reasons: local screenshot text is shorter or longer and reflows, local proof points differ, local payment methods and regulations need naming, and keyword volumes differ per language. In several European markets the highest-volume search term is an English word written in local spelling — you will only find it by looking at local data, never by translating the source listing.

Testing without breaking measurement

Use the platform's own experiment tooling where it exists so traffic splits are honest. Test one element at a time, and give each test the full weekly cycle — store traffic is strongly day-of-week dependent. Never change the listing during the first week of a paid campaign; you will contaminate both readings and be unable to attribute either.

Keep a listing changelog with dates. Six months later, when someone asks why CPI improved in March, the answer will be in that file rather than in memory.

Where ASO meets paid

The two disciplines share one number: cost per install at acceptable retention. A cheap install into a listing that oversells produces a user who uninstalls in three days. Judge listing changes on day-seven retention and post-install events, not on install volume — otherwise you will optimise your way to a very efficient churn machine.

Takeaways

  • Fix conversion elements — icon, first screenshots, ratings — before keyword optimisation if traffic is mostly paid.
  • Match the store page to the ad angle, not to a generic brand template.
  • Judge listing tests on retention and post-install events, not install volume alone.
Written by the Ironvane Media team

Want this applied to your account, not just read?

Every article here comes from something we run in production. We are happy to show you what it looks like on a real account.